AI Model Comparison for Web Development
Based on recent benchmarks and community feedback, here's how current AI models perform for web development tasks. All models can generate functional code, but differ in quality, creativity, and cost.
Still the gold standard for web development with strong coding abilities and good design sense.
- Best for complex projects
- Strong design understanding
- Good at following instructions
- Premium pricing
Very strong performance, often comparable to Claude 3.5 at lower cost. Great for pure development tasks.
- High quality output
- Good value for money
- Strong coding abilities
- Slightly less design-focused
Specialized for coding tasks with excellent performance on development work. Best for pure coding.
- Optimized for code generation
- Very cost-effective
- Large context window
- Less design-focused
Improved coding abilities with good multimodal capabilities. Better for projects needing image understanding.
- Multimodal capabilities
- Good for full-stack projects
- Improved code quality
- Occasional inconsistencies
Strong reasoning but currently slower and more expensive. Better for complex problem-solving than pure coding.
- Excellent reasoning
- Good for complex logic
- Slower response times
- Expensive for simple tasks
CSS Showcase
Modern CSS techniques demonstrated in this proof-of-concept website. All effects are created with pure CSS.
CSS Animations
Smooth floating animation using CSS keyframes with layered elements for depth.
Gradient Effects
Animated gradient background with a moving overlay for visual interest.
3D Card Flip
Hover to flip
3D transform using CSS
Interactive 3D card flip effect using CSS transforms and perspective.
Responsive Design
Flexible grid layout that adapts to different screen sizes with hover effects.